Civil Engineering: 15+ ChatGPT Prompts for Designing and Evaluating Standard Infrastructure Projects
- Nexxant
- Jun 11
- 25 min read
Introduction
In civil engineering, the quality of a technical project goes far beyond its initial sizing. It also depends on a critical and structured evaluation that aligns with technical standards, best practices, and the specific urban, environmental, and geotechnical context. This article compiles a series of advanced prompts for the technical support to development and assessment of civil engineering project, covering foundations, stormwater drainage, pavement design, slope stabilization, hydraulic installations, and earthwork operations.
Each prompt is designed to help professionals perform rigorous, practical evaluations by incorporating applicable codes, inspection methodologies, and actionable recommendations for project improvement. With this structured approach, engineers, consultants, city officials, and construction managers gain a reliable framework for validating plans, identifying design flaws, suggesting corrections, and approving solutions with greater technical and legal confidence.
Prompts Overview
These prompts are optimized for use with ChatGPT but can also be implemented in any other AI tool of your choice such as Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek, or others.
Each topic includes two distinct prompt types:
Development Prompt: Supports the creation or refinement of the project element. Providing supporting documents or reports will improve context and results. Attach files and specify relevant information in the prompt whenever possible.
Evaluation Prompt: Designed to review and assess a provided document related to the topic. Be sure to attach the document for analysis.
Within each prompt, you will find placeholders marked with [brackets] — these should be filled in with project-specific details or context to improve relevance and precision.
The legal, regulatory, and technical context for each prompt has been adapted specifically for the United States (in the English versions) and Brazil (in the Portuguese versions), following the best practices and standards of each country.
If you intend to use these prompts in a different country or region, we recommend adapting them manually or requesting ChatGPT to tailor them according to local regulations and engineering standards.
Let’s get to the prompts!
1.0 Prompt for Fire Protection System Design
Development Prompt
You are a civil engineer specializing in fire protection system design, with extensive experience in code compliance, smart technologies, and risk assessment.
Context: A new project is being developed to implement a fire protection system for a [Type of building, e.g., chemical plant, shopping mall, hospital] located in [Geographic location and climate]. The system must be innovative, efficient, safe, and fully compliant with applicable local and international standards.
Objective
Analyze and propose practical and innovative fire prevention and protection solutions focusing on:
Technical and legal compliance
Emerging technologies
Practical and operational feasibility
Adaptation to environmental and usage conditions
Detailed Instructions
Risk Classification and Applicable Standards
Identify the building’s risk classification (low, medium, high).
Briefly compare relevant U.S. fire codes (e.g., NFPA, IBC) and international standards (e.g., ISO, EN), highlighting critical requirements.
Technological Innovation
What advanced solutions can be incorporated?Examples: smart thermal sensors, AI-powered detection, water mist suppression systems, autonomous firefighting robots.
Design Recommendations
Recommend best practices for this building type: sprinkler systems, standpipes, fire alarms, evacuation routes, and pressurization systems.
Provide minimum sizing guidelines (e.g., water storage volume, pump pressure requirements).
Location and Special Conditions
Identify geographic or climatic challenges (e.g., humidity, altitude, access issues) that may affect system performance or maintenance.
Maintenance and Cost Efficiency
Discuss durability, ease of scheduled inspections, retrofit costs, and integration with existing systems.
Design and Simulation Tools
Recommend tools such as BIM, CFD software, Pathfinder, or Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) to simulate fire spread and evacuation scenarios.
Case Study
Present a real-world success case (e.g., airport, power plant, logistics center) focusing on innovation or effective risk response.
Response Format
Use a modular structure with clear section headings.
Prefer numbered or bulleted lists for technical readability.
Maintain a technical yet accessible tone: define complex terms briefly if necessary.
Conclusion
Summarize the key recommendations.
List 3 practical guidelines for initial implementation.
Include a checklist for code compliance and operational feasibility.
Evaluation Prompt
You are a civil engineer specializing in fire safety design. Your task is to perform a critical, consulting-level review of a fire protection system implementation plan for a specific building.
Context:The plan refers to the installation of a fire protection system in a [TYPE OF BUILDING] located in [LOCATION/CLIMATE CONDITIONS]. The goal is to comply with current regulations, prioritize safety, and incorporate technological innovations that enhance system reliability and performance.
Prompt Objective
Evaluate the fire protection system implementation plan provided, considering technical criteria, legal requirements, and engineering best practices. The analysis must be based on the document attached.
Key Evaluation Criteria
Legal and Code Compliance:
Does the proposal meet U.S. standards such as NFPA 13, NFPA 72, NFPA 101, and relevant sections of the International Building Code (IBC)?
Are applicable international standards (e.g., ISO or EN) referenced where relevant?
System Sizing and Distribution:
Assess whether the number and placement of sprinklers, standpipes, extinguishers, and emergency exits are appropriate for the building’s risk level and floor area.
Consider height, occupancy type, and fire load.
Accessibility and Maintenance:
Are systems positioned for fast, safe access in case of emergency?
Is there a plan for preventive maintenance and routine testing?
Technology and Innovation:
Does the plan incorporate current technologies such as smart detection systems, remote monitoring, or integrated alarms?
Are the proposed solutions technically justified?
Adaptation to Local Conditions:
Does the design account for local climate, water availability, infrastructure, and building-specific constraints?
Are redundancy measures provided for high-risk zones?
Additional Preventive Measures:
Are passive strategies included, such as fire-rated compartments, flame-resistant materials, or protected egress paths?
Does the plan consider evacuation procedures and staff training?
Response Format
Structure your evaluation using numbered topics. For each item, include:
Positive aspects (what’s working well)
Critical or missing elements
Technical or code-based recommendations, citing standards and best practices
Suggestions for improvement
Final Technical Opinion
Classify the overall plan as:
✅ Approved without reservations
⚠️ Approved with technical recommendations
🔧 Requires significant revision
🚫 Non-compliant or technically inadequate
2.0 Prompt for Basic Foundation Design
Development Prompt
You are a civil engineer specializing in foundation design. Your role is to clearly and accurately explain the fundamental principles of designing foundations for small-scale residential buildings, considering local soil and construction characteristics.
Context: The user wants to understand how to design safe and efficient foundations for a [single-story 1,100 ft² home], built on a standard lot in [geographic location] with medium-strength soil (approximately 2,100 psf or 100 kPa).
Prompt Objective
Provide a comprehensive explanation of foundation types, selection criteria, basic calculations, and applicable codes. The goal is to help the user understand the technical decisions involved and identify best practices for their project.
Key Topics to Cover
Foundation Types:
Differentiate between shallow foundations (e.g., isolated footings, slab-on-grade) and deep foundations (e.g., driven piles, drilled piers), with typical use cases.
Selection Criteria:
Explain how the choice depends on soil characteristics (boring logs, SPT results, bearing capacity), building loads, and groundwater table depth.
Design Steps:
Interpreting geotechnical reports
Calculating allowable bearing pressure
Preliminary sizing of footings or piers
Settlement checks and safety verification
Applicable Codes and Standards:
Reference the International Building Code (IBC), ACI 318, and ASCE 7 for structural safety and soil-structure interaction guidelines. Mention any relevant local amendments.
Tools and Best Practices:
Suggest tools like structural spreadsheets, or software such as RISAFoundation, SAFE, or CYPECAD Foundations for foundation modeling.
Common Mistakes to Avoid:
Building on untested or variable soils
Undersizing footings
Ignoring seasonal changes in soil moisture or frost depth
Practical Example:
Describe a foundation design using [32"x32"] square footings for columns in a single-story house, considering a load of [18 kips/column] and soil bearing capacity of [2,100 psf]. Provide a simplified calculation walkthrough.
Conclusion
Summarize key design decisions and emphasize the importance of soil testing and consulting with a licensed structural engineer.
Verification Notice
Remind the user to validate all information with a licensed professional and base the design on actual geotechnical data before starting construction.
Evaluation Prompt
You are a civil engineer specializing in foundation design. Your task is to perform a detailed technical evaluation of the foundation plan for a small residential building.
Context:The project involves a one-story house of approximately [1,100 ft²], located in [city/region], on soil with medium bearing capacity [~2,100 psf]. The submitted plan includes basic sizing and detailing of shallow or deep foundations, based on geotechnical input.
Prompt Objective
Evaluate whether the proposed foundation plan is technically sound and aligned with engineering best practices and current U.S. standards. The analysis should be based on the attached document.
Key Items to Evaluate
Suitability of foundation type in relation to soil and building loads
Consistency of geotechnical data with project assumptions
Accuracy of structural calculations (footing area, allowable stress, settlement checks)
Compliance with U.S. codes like IBC, ACI 318, and ASCE 7
Clarity and coherence of technical drawings and notes
Adoption of sound engineering practices, safety, and constructability
Response Format
Structure your evaluation by numbered sections. For each item, include:
Positive aspects (what is well executed)
Critical or missing elements
Technical or code-based recommendations, citing relevant standards
Suggestions for improvement
Final Technical Opinion
Classify the foundation plan as one of the following:
✅ Approved without reservations
⚠️ Approved with technical recommendations
🔧 Requires significant revision
🚫 Non-compliant or technically inadequate
Optional Additional Notes
[Any additional factors the user wants to consider, such as budget constraints, timeline, or local material availability]
3.0 Prompt for Deep Foundation Design
Development Prompt
Assume the role of a civil engineer specializing in geotechnical foundation design. Your task is to prepare a basic technical proposal for a deep foundation system for a [type of building, such as “mid-rise commercial building”], considering the geotechnical characteristics of the site located in [City and State].
The design must comply with U.S. engineering standards and follow best practices, addressing everything from feasibility analysis to justification of the chosen solution.
Key Aspects to Address
1. Initial Geotechnical Assessment
Describe the predominant soil type and its characteristic strength.
Indicate the depth of load-bearing strata and groundwater presence.
Recommend appropriate site investigation methods (e.g., Standard Penetration Test – ASTM D1586, Cone Penetration Test – ASTM D5778, rotary drilling, etc.).
2. Foundation Type Selection
Compare feasible options: drilled shafts (caissons), continuous flight auger (CFA) piles, micropiles, driven precast piles, etc.
Justify the selected solution based on building loads, soil profile, construction feasibility, cost, and risk.
Discuss estimated axial capacity (tip and shaft resistance), possible negative skin friction, and overall performance.
3. Preliminary Parameters and Sizing
Estimate the service load per pile and total number required.
Define preliminary depth, diameter, and spacing between piles.
Include basic settlement checks and factor of safety recommendations, referencing IBC, ACI 318, and ASCE 7.
4. Construction and Execution Considerations
Recommend a suitable construction method and precautions regarding nearby structures, underground utilities, and vibration control.
Address potential need for temporary shoring, required equipment, and site logistics.
Discuss quality control procedures, including static and dynamic load testing, concrete placement controls, and logging procedures.
5. Applicable Codes and Legal Requirements
Reference key standards: IBC, ACI 318, ASTM D1143 (static pile load testing), ASTM D3689, and ASCE 7.
Mention required permits, professional certification (e.g., PE stamp), and environmental compliance.
Highlight the need for geotechnical and structural inspection reports.
6. Cost and Feasibility Considerations
Provide a rough estimate of unit cost (per linear foot or per pile).
Weigh the advantages and disadvantages of the chosen method versus alternatives.
Include a simplified example using the following soil profile:
Soft clay up to 10 ft, followed by dense sand to 50 ft, average SPT N-value = 12
Recommend a typical pile solution and explain the design logic behind it.
Response Format
Use technical language that is clear and instructional.
Define unfamiliar technical terms briefly when necessary.
Keep your response between [500 and 800] words total.
Conclusion
Summarize your technical recommendations, highlighting feasibility, key risks mitigated by the chosen solution, and viable alternatives if applicable.
Evaluation Prompt
Assume the role of a civil engineer specializing in foundations and geotechnical engineering. Your task is to evaluate a deep foundation design for a [type of building, e.g., “mid-rise commercial building”] located in [City and State].
The objective is to verify whether the project complies with current standards and best practices, and whether the proposed solution is technically adequate given the soil and structural requirements.
Your analysis should be based on the plan attached.
Topics to Evaluate:
1. Geotechnical Assessment and Soil Investigation
Did the plan correctly interpret soil characteristics?
Were soil borings sufficient and appropriate?
Are the applied parameters (SPT, soil type, water table) consistent with the foundation selection?
2. Selection and Justification of Deep Foundation Type
Is the proposed deep foundation system (e.g., CFA, drilled shaft, micropile) technically appropriate for the soil and structure?
Are there both quantitative and qualitative justifications?
3. Sizing and Load Capacity
Evaluate the criteria used for sizing, including depth, diameter, spacing, and estimated axial/bearing capacity.
Check if factors of safety align with IBC, ACI 318, and ASCE 7 recommendations.
4. Execution and Quality Control
Does the plan outline a feasible construction method?
Are quality control measures addressed (e.g., load tests, concrete quality, vibration concerns)?
Are potential disturbances to neighboring structures or utilities considered?
5. Code Compliance and Documentation
Does the design meet applicable U.S. codes (IBC, ACI, ASTM, ASCE)?
Are relevant permits, PE oversight, and environmental or legal documentation included?
6. Technical and Economic Feasibility
Is the solution both cost-effective and technically reliable for the site conditions and building type?
Are alternative options suggested or considered?
Response Format
Structure your evaluation by numbered sections. For each item, include:
Positive aspects (what is adequate)
Critical or missing points
Technical or legal recommendations, citing relevant codes and practices
Suggestions for improvement
Final Technical Opinion
Classify the overall project as:
✅ Approved without reservations
⚠️ Approved with technical recommendations
🔧 Requires significant revision
🚫 Non-compliant or technically inadequate
Optional Comments:
[Include any additional notes from the user, such as budget restrictions, deadlines, or material availability.]
4.0 Prompt for Accessible Infrastructure Design
Development Prompt
Assume the role of a civil engineer specialized in urban and architectural accessibility. Your task is to develop technical and practical design guidelines for a universal accessibility project applicable to a [type of facility, such as public building, school, park, urban sidewalk, etc.] located in [city/region].
Objective
Design inclusive infrastructure solutions that ensure safe, independent, and equitable access for people with disabilities or reduced mobility, in accordance with current U.S. federal, state, and local accessibility laws.
The project should address both new construction and retrofits in existing spaces, with a focus on usability, comfort, safety, and integration into the urban environment.
Technical Aspects to Address
1. Universal Design Principles Applied to the Context
Include examples of ramps, signage, refuge areas, level changes, accessible routes, and similar features.
2. Assessment of Existing Physical Barriers (if applicable)
Evaluate entrance accessibility, corridor width, slope/inclines, sidewalk condition, accessible restrooms, designated parking, and visual/auditory communication systems.
3. Applicable Codes and Standards
Reference key U.S. regulations:
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA Standards)
ABA (Architectural Barriers Act)
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
ICC A117.1 Accessibility Standards
Local and state accessibility codes, if relevant
4. Design Methodology and Technical Criteria
Include minimum parameters:
Ramp slopes (1:12), handrail height, tactile warning surfaces, crossing stripes, turning radii, and materials suited for safety and contrast.
5. Tools and Assistive Technologies
Recommend tools such as BIM software, 3D simulations, or automated ADA compliance checklists to aid in project design and validation.
6. Community Engagement and Usability Testing
Explain how to involve real users with disabilities to test project usability and identify barriers that might not appear in technical drawings.
7. Case Studies and Best Practices
Provide at least one real-world example of a successful accessibility project (U.S. or international), highlighting social and technical impacts.
Response Format
Structure the response into clear, progressive technical sections.
Use technical but accessible language, briefly explaining complex terms.
Keep the text between [500 to 700] words.
Conclusion
Include a summary of the proposed design guidelines, recommendations for drafting accessible architectural/site plans, and stress the importance of technical validation, including engineer certification and approval by local authorities.
Final Verification
Ensure that your recommendations:
Comply with current accessibility codes and standards
Are aligned with the urban and social context of the proposed project
Evaluation Prompt
Assume the role of a civil engineer specialized in urban and architectural accessibility. Your task is to perform a detailed technical evaluation of a previously developed accessibility plan for a [type of facility, such as public building, urban sidewalk, school, etc.] located in [city or region].
Evaluation Objective
Assess the technical, functional, and legal compliance of the plan with universal accessibility standards, considering architectural, urban, and regulatory aspects.
The analysis should be based on the attached project documentation.
Items to Evaluate
1. Access and Circulation
Review main and secondary entries, sidewalks, ramps, corridor width, surface materials, tactile paths, and overall accessible route continuity.
2. Essential Architectural Elements
Check for presence and adequacy of accessible restrooms, minimum doorway clearances, handrails, refuge areas, and signage.
3. Signage, Communication, and Information
Evaluate quality and placement of visual and tactile signage (Braille, pictograms), auditory signals, and accessible information panels.
4. Code and Regulatory Compliance
Verify alignment with:
ADA Standards for Accessible Design
ABA Guidelines
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
ICC A117.1
State and local accessibility regulations, where applicable
5. Reasonable Accommodations and Feasibility
Assess whether the proposed solutions are practically feasible, cost-effective, and appropriately adapted to the project’s physical and financial context.
6. Community Involvement and Real-World Validation
Determine whether the project engaged users with disabilities, included practical testing, or received a formal accessibility compliance review.
Response Format
Structure your evaluation by numbered sections. For each item, provide:
Positive aspects (what is working well)
Critical or missing points
Technical or legal recommendations, referencing codes and best practices
Suggestions for improvement
Final Technical Opinion
Classify the plan as:
✅ Approved without reservations
⚠️ Approved with technical recommendations
🔧 Requires significant revision
🚫 Non-compliant or technically inadequate
5.0 Prompt for Plumbing System Design
Development Prompt
Assume the role of a civil engineer specializing in building plumbing systems. Your task is to develop a detailed technical guide for the design, sizing, and execution of plumbing systems in a [building type, e.g., multifamily residential, commercial building, public facility] located in [city/state/country].
Objective
Provide a practical and updated guideline for designing building plumbing systems, covering everything from preliminary assessment to execution, based on U.S. plumbing codes, engineering best practices, and sustainable solutions.
Technical Aspects to Address
1. Scope of Plumbing Systems
Cold and hot water supply
Sanitary drainage
Stormwater drainage
Water reuse and rainwater harvesting (if applicable)
2. Project Phases and Design Workflow
Site and usage data collection
Design criteria (flow rate, pressure, pipe diameter)
Development of schematic and construction drawings
Coordination with architectural, structural, and MEP disciplines
Specification of materials, fittings, fixtures, and equipment
3. Codes and Regulatory Standards
International Plumbing Code (IPC)
Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC)
ICC A117.1 for accessibility
ANSI/ASSE standards for materials and devices
NSF 61 for potable water safety
Any applicable state and local plumbing or environmental health codes
4. Sustainable Solutions and Innovations
Use of low-flow fixtures, smart water meters, and IoT-based leak monitoring
PEX, CPVC, and other modern, durable materials
Individual submeters and pressure-reducing devices
Greywater reuse and rainwater harvesting systems where allowed
5. Common Challenges and Solutions
Conflicts with structure or electrical/mechanical systems
Excessive pressure loss due to poor routing
Overpressure or insufficient flow at fixtures
Installation issues and construction quality control
6. Illustrative Case Study
Provide an example of a residential building plumbing design including hot water circulation, pressure boosting, and rainwater reuse system, with brief justification of design choices.
Response Format
Structure your response in numbered sections by design stage
Use concise, technical language, with brief definitions for specialized terms
Include diagrams or simplified schematics where helpful
Limit the response to 900 words maximum
Conclusion
Summarize the key points covered, and provide practical recommendations for ensuring hydraulic efficiency, ease of maintenance, and code compliance.
Final Verification
Ensure your recommendations:
Comply with relevant plumbing and safety codes
Consider the climatic, urban, and socioeconomic context of the project
Evaluation Prompt
You are a civil engineer specialized in plumbing system design. Your task is to perform a detailed technical review of a building plumbing system project for a [building type – e.g., multifamily residential, commercial, public facility] located in [city/state/country].
The analysis should be based on the plan provided in the attached document.
Prompt Objective
Critically assess the submitted plumbing plan, verifying its technical adequacy, code compliance, best practices, and potential for optimization, especially regarding sustainability and operational efficiency.
Key Aspects to Evaluate
1. Scope and System Integration
Does the project include all necessary systems (cold water, hot water, sanitary drainage, stormwater, reuse)?
Is there proper coordination with architectural, structural, and other systems?
2. Sizing Criteria and Hydraulic Performance
Are flow rates and pressures correctly estimated for the building type and usage?
Are the specified pipe diameters and materials appropriate?
Are pressure loss calculations and critical point verifications included?
3. Code Compliance and Legal Requirements
Does the project comply with the following (as applicable)?
IPC / UPC
ANSI/ASSE standards
NSF 61
State/local health and plumbing codes
Are sanitary, safety, and environmental regulations observed?
4. Sustainability and Innovation
Are technologies such as:
Individual water meters
Greywater reuse
Low-flow fixtures
Smart pressure control or solar water heating considered?
5. Maintenance, Safety, and Accessibility
Is the system easy to inspect, maintain, and operate in emergencies?
Are water tanks, valves, risers, and access points well-located and documented?
Are shutoff valves clearly marked and strategically positioned?
6. Execution and Construction Detailing
Are details sufficient for accurate field implementation?
Are section views, isometric diagrams, and material tables well developed?
Does the technical memo include relevant codes and justifications?
Response Format
Structure your evaluation by numbered sections. For each item, present:
Positive aspects (what is adequate)
Critical or missing elements
Technical or code-based recommendations, citing best practices
Suggestions for improvement
Final Technical Opinion
Classify the plan as:
✅ Approved without reservations
⚠️ Approved with technical recommendations
🔧 Requires significant revision
🚫 Non-compliant or technically inadequate
6.0 Prompt for Pavement Design Project
Development Prompt
Assume the role of a civil engineer specializing in pavement design. Your task is to develop a detailed technical plan for the pavement of a [type of infrastructure such as urban road, rural highway, logistics access route, airport runway, etc.], located in [municipality/state with specific geotechnical and climatic conditions].
Objective
Ensure structural performance, durability, road safety, and sustainability, in compliance with current U.S. technical standards and engineering best practices.
Aspects to Address
1. Infrastructure and Local Conditions Assessment
Estimated traffic type and volume (ADT, ESALs, heavy trucks)
Local topography, rainfall patterns, and subgrade geotechnical conditions
Road classification and intended function (local, collector, arterial, etc.)
2. Pavement Type Selection
Flexible, rigid, interlocking, or alternative pavements
Criteria for selecting the most appropriate system based on traffic load, soil, climate, and design life
Comparative analysis (cost, maintenance, construction complexity, ride quality)
3. Structural Design and Materials
Layer configuration (surface, base, subbase) and thicknesses
Material selection and technical justification (e.g., HMA, crushed aggregate base, concrete, asphalt-treated base)
Adherence to standards such as AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, ASTM standards, and State DOT manuals
4. Integration with Complementary Systems
Surface and subsurface drainage design
Curbs, storm inlets, roadside slopes
Roadway markings, signage, and safety elements
5. Sustainable Solutions and Innovation
Use of recycled materials (e.g., RAP, recycled concrete aggregate, crumb rubber)
Permeable pavements and eco-friendly additives
Design strategies to lower carbon footprint and extend maintenance intervals
6. Case Study or Best Practice Reference
Mention at least one real-world project (U.S. or international) that applied best practices
Present achieved benefits (cost savings, durability, reduced maintenance)
Response Format
Organize the response into numbered sections corresponding to the items above
Use technical yet accessible language and explain any less common terminology
Limit the total length to 700 words
Conclusion
Summarize the key recommendations, including:
Most appropriate pavement type
Critical design considerations
Practical sustainability suggestions
Verification Notice
Emphasize the need to validate the preliminary design using local data (traffic studies, geotechnical reports, available budget) and to consult updated standards such as:
AASHTO Pavement Design Guide
ASTM D2940, D1557, C136
State DOT pavement design manuals
Evaluation Prompt
Assume the role of a civil engineer specializing in road infrastructure and pavement systems. Your task is to perform a comprehensive technical review of a pavement design project prepared for a [type of infrastructure – e.g., mid-volume urban street, rural access road, freight highway].
Evaluation Objective
Assess the technical quality, regulatory compliance, and engineering soundness of the project, and identify areas for improvement. The analysis must be based on the plan attached.
Evaluation Topics
1. Roadway Assessment and Local Context
Has the design correctly identified traffic classification (ADT, truck volume), topography, rainfall intensity, geotechnical conditions, and roadway function?
Are these factors appropriately reflected in the design strategy?
2. Pavement Type Selection and Justification
Evaluate the appropriateness of the selected pavement type (flexible, rigid, recycled, interlocking)
Review cost-benefit alignment with project needs and constraints
3. Layer Design and Specified Materials
Check thickness design methodology and material choice (e.g., HMA, stabilized base, soil cement)
Verify alignment with standards such as AASHTO, ASTM, and applicable State DOT guidelines
4. Drainage and Roadway Safety Systems
Review integration with surface and subsurface drainage systems, curb design, and stormwater structures
Evaluate planned signage, markings, and safety features for pedestrians and vehicles
5. Sustainability and Innovation
Is the project incorporating RAP, recycled materials, permeable options, or emission-reducing additives?
Are environmental improvements achieved without compromising structural integrity?
6. Regulatory Compliance and Documentation
Verify compliance with national and state standards
Assess clarity of drawings, technical specifications, timelines, and supporting documentation
Response Format
Structure your evaluation by numbered sections. For each item, provide:
Positive aspects (what is adequate)
Critical or missing points
Technical or legal recommendations, referencing best practices and standards
Suggestions for improvement
Final Technical Opinion
Classify the project as:
✅ Approved without reservations
⚠️ Approved with technical recommendations
🔧 Requires significant revision
🚫 Non-compliant or technically inadequate
7.0 Prompt for Stormwater Drainage Design
Development Prompt
Assume the role of a civil engineer specializing in urban drainage. Your task is to develop a detailed technical stormwater management plan for an area located in [Project location], which currently faces [Identified problem such as frequent flooding, excessive impervious surfaces, or lack of surface runoff systems].
Objective
Design a solution to control surface runoff, prevent urban flooding, and promote sustainable stormwater management in accordance with U.S. regulations and engineering best practices.
Aspects to Address
1. Site Assessment
Analyze local topography, degree of imperviousness, runoff coefficient, and watershed behavior
Identify urban and environmental impacts caused by the absence or undersizing of drainage infrastructure
2. Hydraulic Design Criteria
Calculate design flow rates using methods such as the Rational Method or EPA SWMM modeling
Define recurrence interval, rainfall intensity (IDF curves), drainage area, and required retention volume
3. Proposed Engineering Solutions
Choose from structures such as:
Curb inlets, storm sewer pipes, energy dissipators, detention/retention basins, rain gardens, infiltration trenches, pervious pavements
Justify the chosen solution based on urban, hydraulic, and land-use context
4. Urban Integration and Sustainability
Apply Low Impact Development (LID) or Green Infrastructure principles
Assess potential for rainwater harvesting and beneficial reuse
Discuss landscape integration and reduction of environmental footprint
5. Applicable Codes and Regulations
Refer to:
EPA SWMM Guidelines
ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 56
State stormwater manuals, local drainage codes, and environmental permitting requirements
FEMA floodplain management rules if relevant
6. Operation, Maintenance, and Performance Monitoring
Provide guidance on:
Periodic inspections, cleaning schedules, vegetation management, sediment control
Expected performance indicators (e.g., water levels, time to drain, overflow frequency)
Response Format
Structure your proposal in six ordered sections matching the items above
Use technical but clear language, providing brief definitions for advanced terms
Include real-world examples or reference projects where applicable
Suggested word limit: 800 words
Avoid unexplained jargon
Use local rainfall and topography data if provided
Conclusion
Summarize proposed solutions, technical benefits, and critical implementation considerations.If appropriate, suggest validation steps such as hydraulic modeling, SWMM simulations, or field tests.
Optional Customization
[Insert additional user-provided data: soil type, environmental constraints, budget limitations, etc.]
Evaluation Prompt
Assume the role of a civil engineer specialized in urban stormwater and microdrainage systems. Your task is to critically evaluate a stormwater drainage plan for the area of [Project location], which faces [Identified issue: recurring floods, high imperviousness, steep slopes, etc.].
The analysis should be based on the attached project documentation.
Objective
Evaluate whether the proposed plan meets engineering best practices, complies with current U.S. standards, and is appropriate for the urban and environmental context.Your opinion should highlight strengths, critical gaps, technical recommendations, and opportunities for improvement.
Items to Evaluate
1. Hydrological Diagnosis and Site Characterization
Assessment of drainage area, impervious surface ratio, and land use
Comparison with regional rainfall data and appropriate runoff coefficients
2. Hydraulic Design
Review of flow rate calculations
Evaluation of chosen design methods (e.g., Rational Method, SWMM, dynamic simulations)
Appropriateness of recurrence interval and criteria for extreme events
3. Proposed Drainage Structures
Types of structures adopted (e.g., curb inlets, gutters, manholes, storm sewers, retention ponds)
Suitability for site topography, available space, and connection to existing infrastructure
4. Sustainability and Green Infrastructure
Integration of features such as rain gardens, permeable pavements, infiltration trenches, or detention/retention systems
Potential for stormwater reuse and public space enhancement
5. Code Compliance and Legal Requirements
Compliance with:
EPA SWMM guidelines
ASCE 56
State and municipal drainage codes
Environmental permits, stormwater pollution prevention plans (SWPPP)
Evidence of professional oversight (e.g., PE stamp) and documentation quality
6. Maintenance, Operation, and Risk Mitigation
Presence of a maintenance plan (frequency, responsibilities, procedures)
Measures to prevent clogging, sedimentation, or water contamination
Public safety considerations
Response Format
Structure your evaluation in numbered sections. For each item, present:
Positive aspects (what is adequate)
Critical or missing elements
Technical or regulatory recommendations, citing best practices
Suggestions for improvement
Context Fit Check
Are local conditions adequately addressed?
What adjustments are needed prior to implementation?
Are there unaddressed risks or environmental impacts?
Final Technical Opinion
Classify the project as:
✅ Approved without reservations
⚠️ Approved with technical recommendations
🔧 Requires significant revision
🚫 Non-compliant or technically inadequate
8.0 Prompt for Earthwork Design Project
Development Prompt
Assume the role of a civil engineer specializing in earthwork and grading design for infrastructure and building projects. Your task is to develop a comprehensive, technically sound earthwork plan for a project site located in [Site location or soil condition, e.g., "urban area with soft clay and moderate slopes"], taking into account specific conditions provided by the user.
Objective
Design a safe, efficient, and technically appropriate earthwork project, covering excavation and fill balancing, temporary or permanent slope stabilization, site access, temporary drainage, and terrain stability during all phases of construction.
Key Aspects to Address
1. Site Assessment
Topographic conditions and natural terrain characteristics (average slope, obstructions, soil type, water table presence, adjacent buildings)
Geotechnical evaluation based on boring logs and soil classification
2. Earthwork Planning Stages
Establishing design grades and finished elevation
Estimating cut and fill volumes for mass balance
Selection and sizing of equipment (excavators, dump trucks, compactors, dozers)
Construction strategy: work phases, temporary slopes, internal haul routes, estimated duration
3. Compaction and Quality Control
Compaction methods based on soil type
Required tests: Standard/Modified Proctor (ASTM D698/D1557), CBR (ASTM D1883), moisture-density relationships
Frequency and procedures based on ASTM D1556, D6938, and USACE EM 1110-1-1804 recommendations
4. Slope Stability and Retaining Structures
Calculation of safe slope angles and factors of safety
When to use retaining systems (gabion walls, reinforced soil, gravity walls, etc.)
Assess potential impacts on adjacent structures (lateral pressure, differential settlement)
5. Temporary Drainage and Erosion Control
Design of surface diversion channels, temporary ditches, check dams, and sediment traps
Use of erosion control blankets, turf reinforcement mats, or geotextiles
Safe direction of stormwater runoff during grading operations
6. Applicable Standards and Legal Requirements
Reference key standards such as:
ASTM D1557, D2487, D698 (Soil classification and compaction)
FHWA-NHI-06-088 (Slope stability)
OSHA Subpart P for trenching and excavation
State DOT grading manuals, local stormwater BMPs, and SWPPP requirements
Response Format
Organize the content into six clearly numbered technical sections
Include real-world examples or case studies when possible
Use clear and professional language; avoid unnecessary jargon
Suggested length: 600 to 900 words
Conclusion
Reinforce key technical considerations, best practices, and execution guidelines for safe and efficient grading.Recommend tools like Civil 3D, Revit Terrain, or drone-based topographic surveys to optimize planning.Advise on the need for oversight by a licensed engineer (PE) with documented project responsibility.
Evaluation Prompt
You are a civil engineer with expertise in earthwork and site grading for infrastructure and land development. Your task is to conduct a critical, technically grounded review of a completed earthwork plan, verifying compliance with engineering best practices, applicable U.S. standards, and potential construction risks.
Prompt Objective
Evaluate whether the plan demonstrates sound engineering logic, operational efficiency, site safety, and regulatory compliance.Your analysis must be based on the attached project documentation.
Key Items to Evaluate
1. Site Conditions and Geotechnical Investigation
Assessment of topography, soil classification, and boring log interpretation
Consistency between site data and risk areas (e.g., groundwater, rock outcrops, expansive or unstable soils)
2. Cut and Fill Volume Analysis
Review of volume calculation methods
Assessment of mass balance logic between cut and fill
Identification of need for off-site borrow or disposal (spoils)
3. Slope Stability and Retaining Measures
Evaluation of proposed cut/fill slope angles
Presence or absence of appropriate retaining structures in critical zones
Conformance with FHWA and state slope design criteria
4. Compaction and Testing Standards
Review of proposed compaction methods and control parameters
Presence of required tests: Proctor, CBR, moisture-density verification
Compliance with ASTM standards, QA/QC plans, and frequency of inspection
5. Temporary Drainage and Erosion Control
Verification of temporary drainage layout, erosion protection, and flow redirection
Use of check dams, sediment control, and slope protection measures (e.g., hydroseeding, riprap)
6. Regulatory and Environmental Compliance
Compliance with state grading codes, city ordinances, stormwater permits (SWPPP)
Presence of Construction Waste Management Plans or Erosion and Sediment Control Plans if required
Response Format
Structure your evaluation by numbered sections. For each item, present:
Positive aspects (what is adequate)
Critical or missing elements
Technical or legal recommendations, referencing relevant codes
Suggestions for improvement
Final Technical Opinion
Provide a summary technical judgment and classify the plan as:
✅ Approved without reservations
⚠️ Approved with technical recommendations
🔧 Requires significant revision
🚫 Non-compliant or technically inadequate
9.0 Prompt for Slope Stabilization and Retaining System Design
Development Prompt
Assume the role of a civil engineer specializing in geotechnical engineering. You have been contracted to develop a comprehensive slope stabilization plan for an urban site in [Geographic Location] that experiences frequent slope failures or landslides.
Prompt Objective
Design a technically sound slope containment plan that ensures ground stability, protects residents and infrastructure, and complies with U.S. geotechnical codes and best engineering practices.
Required Aspects to Address
1. Geotechnical Diagnosis and Terrain Conditions
Slope characteristics (angle, height, soil type, vegetation cover)
History of slope failures and primary causes (e.g., infiltration, surcharge, erosion)
Geotechnical investigations: boring logs, permeability tests, shear strength parameters
2. Applicable Containment Techniques
Compare at least three stabilization methods such as:
Soil nailing
Segmental retaining walls or cast-in-place concrete walls
Gabion walls, geosynthetics, mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls
Selection criteria: soil properties, drainage, load conditions, construction feasibility, cost, and longevity
3. Surface and Subsurface Drainage
Surface drainage: swales, ditches, turf reinforcement mats
Subsurface drainage: horizontal drains, French drains, vertical relief wells, geocomposites
Preventing saturation and reducing pore water pressure
4. Project Design and Execution Stages
Topographic and geotechnical survey
Stability analysis (e.g., Bishop, Janbu, or Limit Equilibrium methods)
Numerical or 2D/3D geotechnical modeling
Phased execution timeline
Monitoring strategies and maintenance requirements
5. Codes and Regulatory Requirements
Reference standards such as:
FHWA-NHI-06-087 & 06-088 (Soil nail walls, slope design)
USACE EM 1110-2-1902 (Slope stability)
ASCE 7 for load combinations
Address environmental permits, local government regulations, and potential impacts to protected areas or right-of-ways
6. Case Study for Reference
Present at least one successful slope stabilization case (U.S. or international), including:
The adopted solution
Performance over time
Safety or urban integration improvements
Response Format
Organize the content into clearly titled technical sections
Use accessible technical language with concise explanations of key concepts
Include bullet points or subheadings where appropriate
Suggested length: up to [1,000] words
Conclusion
Summarize technical best practices, emphasizing:
Recommended solutions based on slope conditions
The critical role of drainage systems
The need for ongoing monitoring and inspections
Conclude by advising that the final design must be based on local field investigations and reviewed by a licensed geotechnical engineer (PE).
Customization Note
Replace the following fields with project-specific values:
[Geographic Location]
[Slope Type – natural, cut slope, urban embankment, etc.]
[Environmental or regulatory constraints]
Evaluation Prompt
You are a civil engineer with expertise in geotechnical engineering and slope stabilization systems. Your task is to conduct a technical review of a previously prepared slope stabilization plan.
Prompt Objective
Verify the technical soundness, safety, feasibility, and legal compliance of the plan for an area prone to slope failure or soil instability, focusing on the location identified as [Geographic Location or Project Name].
The review must be based on the attached engineering documentation.
Evaluation Topics
1. Geotechnical Diagnosis and Slope Characterization
Clarity and reliability of presented data (slope geometry, soil classification, history of movement, zoning data)
Availability of geological mapping, field testing, and risk analysis
2. Proposed Stabilization Solutions
Suitability of selected methods (e.g., soil nailing, retaining walls, wire mesh, geosynthetics)
Design parameters: depth, inclination, structural load capacity
Stability calculations using recognized methods(e.g., minimum Factor of Safety ≥ 1.5 for long-term slopes)
3. Drainage Systems
Presence and adequacy of surface drainage (channels, ditches, turf reinforcement)
Deep drainage systems (horizontal drains, drainage wells, geosynthetic layers)
Local hydrologic considerations and flow direction strategy
4. Legal and Regulatory Compliance
Alignment with relevant codes and standards:
FHWA, USACE, ASCE, and State DOT guidelines
Verification of permits, environmental reviews, and coordination with local agencies
If located in a protected area, check EPA and FEMA requirements, Clean Water Act, or relevant local erosion control ordinances
5. Construction Phasing, Monitoring, and Maintenance
Existence of a detailed execution timeline
Monitoring tools (e.g., inclinometers, piezometers, settlement plates)
Long-term inspection plan for structure integrity and vegetation management
6. Environmental Integration and Sustainability
Environmental impact of the chosen solution
Integration with surrounding natural or urban settings
Use of hybrid solutions (natural engineering + structural systems), if appropriate
Response Format
Structure your evaluation by numbered sections. For each topic, include:
Positive aspects (what meets standards)
Critical or missing elements
Technical or regulatory recommendations, referencing standards and guidelines
Suggestions for improvement
Final Technical Opinion
Provide your final judgment, classifying the plan as:
✅ Approved without reservations
⚠️ Approved with technical recommendations
🔧 Requires significant revision
🚫 Non-compliant or technically inadequate
Final Note: If you found these prompts useful, be sure to explore the other articles in this series. The most recent ones are featured in the _Recent Posts_ section below. You can also find all civil engineering prompt articles by clicking on the "Civil Engineering Prompts" dedicated tag at the end of this post.
Conclusion
Evaluating civil engineering projects is a strategic task that requires not only strong technical knowledge, but also critical thinking, contextual sensitivity, and full understanding of applicable standards and regulatory frameworks.
The prompts presented in this article were designed to serve as standardized and effective tools for technical analysis across multiple domains — including urban infrastructure, hydraulics, geotechnical design, and site development.
By using this structured approach, professionals such as civil engineers, municipal reviewers, and consultants will be better equipped to detect risks, suggest improvements, and issue well-supported technical opinions. This methodology also helps raise the quality of both public and private construction projects, ensuring greater safety, efficiency, and sustainability in engineering practices.
Whether you’re working with drainage design, earthwork planning, or slope stabilization, these AI-assisted prompts will help guide your review process with technical rigor and regulatory alignment.
Enjoyed this article? Share it on social media and continue to follow us to stay tuned on the latest in AI, breakthroughs and emerging technologies.
Thanks for your time!😉
Comments